$165.6 Billion: The Real Cost of Federal Workforce Cuts
The Partnership for Public Service calculated Trump's federal workforce changes cost $165.6 billion. Here's how the math breaks down and what it means for you.


Need a professional headshot? Pro headshots AI-generated in 60 seconds
$165.6 Billion: The Real Cost of Federal Workforce Cuts
Last Updated: April 19, 2026
The federal workforce shrank by approximately 278,000 employees between January 2025 and February 2026, reaching its lowest level since 1966. DOGE claimed that cutting saved $160 to $215 billion. The Partnership for Public Service ran the actual numbers and found the opposite: the cuts cost the economy $165.6 billion.
That figure, from the Partnership's Federal Harms Tracker released April 9, 2026, breaks into two parts. $71 billion in direct workforce costs that the government actually paid. And $94.6 billion in economic activity lost when science grants were terminated. Both numbers are documented, sourced, and, according to the Partnership's data director Brandon Lardy, "conservative."
Key Takeaways
- Federal workforce actions cost the U.S. economy $165.6 billion, per the Partnership for Public Service's Federal Harms Tracker
- DOGE claimed $160 to $215 billion in savings. Independent verification (American Enterprise Institute) puts actual savings at roughly $10 billion
- The largest single cost: $53.2 billion in productivity losses from disengaged federal workers who remained on the job
- The DRP alone cost $4.5 billion in pay for 137,000 employees who were barred from working
- DC is projected to enter a mild recession with GDP contracting 1.9%, losing more jobs than any other major metro
- IRS workforce cuts could cost the Treasury $198 billion to $600 billion in lost revenue over a decade
The $71 Billion in Direct Workforce Costs
These are dollars the government actually spent, not estimates or projections.
| Line Item | Cost |
|---|---|
| Disengaged federal employees (Gallup 34% productivity formula) | $53.2 billion |
| 2025 partial government shutdown GDP loss | $11.0 billion |
| Deferred Resignation Program (137,000 employees paid not to work) | $4.5 billion |
| Severance for 10,400+ RIF'd employees | $764 million |
| Administrative leave, USAID (contested terminations) | $298 million |
| Administrative leave, CFPB | $152 million |
| Administrative leave, USAGM | $126 million |
| Administrative leave, Dept. of Education OCR | $37 million |
| DOGE operations | $81 million |
| Rehiring wrongly terminated employees | $12 million |
| RIF execution costs | $5.9 million |
| Total direct costs | $71.0 billion |
The disengagement line item ($53.2 billion) is the most debatable. The Partnership surveyed 11,000+ federal workers after OPM cancelled the 2025 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, then applied Gallup's research showing disengaged employees cost employers 34% of their annual salary. The "thriving" rate among federal workers dropped from 58% in 2024 to 48% in 2025.
The DRP line ($4.5 billion) is straightforward. 137,000 employees accepted deferred resignation, received an average of $2,055/week plus 38% in benefits, and were contractually barred from working during the administrative leave period. That is $4.5 billion in pay for zero output.
The $94.6 Billion in Lost Economic Activity
This is where the methodology gets more contested.
| Terminated Grants | Economic Loss (at $2.56 multiplier) |
|---|---|
| EPA grants | $72.8 billion |
| CDC grants | $17.8 billion |
| NSF grants | $1.8 billion |
| NIH grants | $1.3 billion |
| SAMHSA grants | $996 million |
| USAID closure legal costs | $344 million |
| Lost NPS fees (shutdown) | $41 million |
| Total | $94.6 billion |
The multiplier comes from a 2024 study by United for Medical Research and the Association of American Universities: every $1 invested in NIH research generates $2.56 in U.S. economic activity through labor, supplies, and local spending. The Partnership applied this multiplier to all terminated science agency grants, not just NIH.
Fair criticism: the $2.56 NIH multiplier may not apply equally to EPA cleanup grants or SAMHSA behavioral health grants. Lardy acknowledged this, calling the total "conservative" because it excludes lawsuit defense costs, long-run IRS revenue loss, and downstream GDP effects.
DOGE's Claims vs. Reality
| Source | Figure |
|---|---|
| DOGE.gov official tracker | $160 to $215 billion in claimed savings |
| American Enterprise Institute (verified) | ~$10 billion |
| Partnership for Public Service (economic cost) | $165.6 billion in costs |
| Yale Budget Lab (IRS revenue loss alone, 10-year) | Up to $600 billion |
NPR found that all 13 of DOGE's largest claimed contract cancellations contained errors: double-counting, inflated contract ceiling values (the maximum a contract could theoretically reach, not actual spending), or contracts that had already expired. A DOGE employee testified in a March 2026 deposition that DOGE was "unable to lower the federal deficit."
Put differently: for every $1 DOGE verifiably saved, the workforce changes cost the economy $16.
Where the Workforce Went
The federal civilian workforce dropped from approximately 2,313,000 on inauguration day (January 20, 2025) to approximately 2,028,000 by February 2026. That is a 12% decline in 13 months, the fastest peacetime federal workforce reduction on record.
| Agency | Reduction | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| USAID | 4,895 → 370 | -92.4% |
| National Endowments (Arts/Humanities) | — | -56.6% |
| AmeriCorps | — | -43.6% |
| Department of Education | — | -42.6% |
| Small Business Administration | — | -32.9% |
| USAGM (Voice of America) | — | -32.7% |
| National Science Foundation | — | -30.3% |
| Treasury (including IRS) | -31,600 | -28.0% |
| Veterans Affairs | -10,300 | -5 to 10% |
| Department of Defense (civilian) | -15,029 | <5% |
Two agencies grew: ICE (+36.1%) and Customs and Border Protection (+1.5%). Every other major department shrank.
For comparison, the Clinton-era National Performance Review (1993 to 2000) cut more total employees (377,000+), but over seven years, with bipartisan legislation that passed 391-17 in the House, targeting Cold War defense positions. The 2025 to 2026 reductions happened in 13 months, without congressional authorization, concentrated in civilian policy, science, and enforcement agencies.
The DC Metro Fallout
The economic damage is not evenly distributed. DC took the heaviest hit.
- DC's GDP is projected to contract 1.9% in FY2026
- A 10% reduction in federal DC employment causes a 2.6% GDP decline (Brookings)
- The DC metro area lost more jobs in 2025 than any other major U.S. metro
- DC's Chief Financial Officer projects a $1 billion revenue shortfall through FY2028
- National long-term unemployment rose by 322,000 over the year, consistent with displaced federal workers struggling to transition
The Bill That's Still Coming
The $165.6 billion figure does not include several costs that are still accumulating.
The Yale Budget Lab estimates IRS workforce cuts will reduce federal revenue by $198 billion over a decade. If the cuts deepen to 28,000 total positions, the loss could reach $600 billion. The IRS is one of the few agencies that generates more revenue than it costs to run. Cutting enforcement staff is the fiscal equivalent of closing a profitable store to save on payroll.
The OPM retirement backlog peaked at 65,237 claims in early 2026. Processing times have stretched to 6 to 9 months. Each delayed claim is a retiree waiting for their full annuity, often living on 60 to 80% interim pay.
The Merit Systems Protection Board has received 11,000+ appeals from terminated employees. Each case requires government lawyers to defend. Several major cases have resulted in reinstatement with back pay, adding to the rehiring costs already tallied above.
Calculate Your Severance
If you are facing a RIF or considering a buyout, the numbers matter. Federal severance follows a statutory formula: one week of pay per year of service, capped at 52 weeks. The 10,400+ employees who were RIF'd through formal procedures received an average of approximately $73,000 in severance.
Use the Severance Pay Calculator to estimate your specific payout. If you are weighing VERA/VSIP, the VERA/VSIP Decision Calculator compares your buyout offer against staying.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does the $165.6 billion figure come from?
The Partnership for Public Service's Federal Harms Tracker calculated the total as of their April 9, 2026 press briefing. It combines $71 billion in direct workforce costs with $94.6 billion in economic activity lost from terminated science grants. The Partnership's data director called it "a conservative estimate" because it excludes IRS revenue loss, lawsuit costs, and downstream GDP effects.
How much did DOGE actually save?
DOGE's official tracker claimed $160 to $215 billion. The American Enterprise Institute, a center-right think tank, verified approximately $10 billion after removing double-counting and inflated contract ceiling values. NPR found that all 13 of DOGE's largest claimed cancellations contained errors.
What is the most debatable part of the $165.6 billion?
The $53.2 billion disengagement cost (Gallup formula applied to a Partnership survey of 11,000+ workers) and the $94.6 billion science grant multiplier (using a NIH-specific $2.56 multiplier across all science agencies) are the most methodologically contested components. The direct pay costs ($4.5B DRP, $764M severance, $613M administrative leave) are the most defensible.
Could IRS cuts really cost $600 billion?
The Yale Budget Lab modeled this scenario: if IRS enforcement staff drops by 28,000, the resulting reduction in audits and collections could reduce federal revenue by $600 billion over a decade. A more conservative estimate from the same analysis puts the figure at $198 billion. Either way, the IRS is one of the few government agencies that generates more revenue than it costs to operate.
How does this compare to past workforce reductions?
The Clinton-era National Performance Review (1993 to 2000) cut 377,000+ employees, but over seven years with bipartisan legislation and targeted at Cold War defense positions. The 2013 sequestration furloughed 770,000+ workers temporarily but did not create permanent separations at scale. The 2025 to 2026 cuts are the largest and fastest peacetime reduction on record, concentrated in civilian agencies and executed without congressional authorization.
Related Resources
- Severance Pay Calculator: Estimate your RIF severance payout
- VERA/VSIP Decision Calculator: Compare buyout vs. staying
- FERS Retirement Calculator: Model your pension if you're considering early retirement
- State of the Federal Workforce 2026: Our flagship annual report with 50+ workforce statistics
- DRP Cost: The Government Paid $4.5 Billion: Deep dive on the Deferred Resignation Program
- Federal Workforce at Lowest Since 1960s: Historical headcount context
- DOGE Contract Cancellation Costs: How contract terminations added to the bill
- RIF Survival Guide 2026: Your rights during a Reduction in Force
Sources
- Partnership for Public Service — Federal Harms Tracker
- Government Executive — Federal workforce changes cost $165.6B
- Federal News Network — $4.5 billion DRP cost
- Pew Research Center — Federal workforce shrank 10%
- Yale Budget Lab — Weakened IRS revenue consequences
- American Enterprise Institute — DOGE verified savings
- Brookings — DC region economic warning signs
- GAO-26-108719 — Federal agency workforce changes
- NPR — DOGE data doesn't add up


Need a professional headshot? Pro headshots AI-generated in 60 seconds