FEHB Plan Comparison
Premium is only half the cost. Put two or three 2026 plans side by side on premium plus expected out-of-pocket, then read the break-even spend that tells you how far your year would have to go before the cheaper plan changes.
Reviewed by Jonathan D., 20-year federal employee · Formulas verified against OPM 2026 premium rates ·
| What this models | Not modeled |
|---|---|
| Enrollee premium by tier for 10 nationwide-priced 2026 plans, from the OPM-verified repo dataset | Regional HMOs (Kaiser, UnitedHealthcare and similar). OPM prices those per state or region, so one number would be wrong |
| In-network deductible and catastrophic limit (out-of-pocket maximum) | Out-of-network deductibles and limits, which are higher and are not applied here |
| Primary care and specialist copays, shown for reference | Copays inside the cost math. The dataset has no per-service utilization, so the model uses charges and the deductible, not visit counts |
| Your coinsurance percentage as an explicit input, plus the 0 to 100 percent envelope | A real coinsurance rate. The 2026 dataset has no coinsurance field, so none is assumed for you |
| HSA eligibility per plan | HSA or HRA pass-through dollars, shown as n/a for every plan. The dataset records eligibility but not the amount |
| Active-employee enrollee share (5 U.S.C. 8906(b)) | Annuitant monthly billing, FEHB and Medicare coordination, PSHB, and TRICARE interactions |
| Break-even spend scanned from $0 to $60,000 in $1 steps | Crossovers above $60,000, and any crossover driven by services the model does not see |
| Precision: premiums to the cent, totals rounded to the dollar for display | Prescription tiers, dental and vision (FEDVIP), FSA offsets, and taxes |
Why the cheapest premium is often not the cheapest plan
Two plans can differ by $1,400 a year in premium and still land within $50 of each other on total cost, because the plan with the lower premium carries the higher deductible and you pay that difference back the first time you use the plan. The only comparison that answers the question is premium plus out-of-pocket, computed at the amount of care you actually expect.
That is also why the break-even number matters more than the winner. If the crossover sits at $500 of charges, you are one urgent-care visit away from the other plan being the better pick, and the choice is close to a coin flip. If the crossover sits at $30,000, the decision is stable and you can stop thinking about it.
What the tool refuses to guess
FEHB plans pay a share of charges above the deductible, and that share varies by plan and by service. The 2026 dataset in this repo does not carry a coinsurance rate, so rather than quietly assume one, the tool takes your figure as an input and reports the whole envelope alongside it: the floor, where the plan covers everything past the deductible, and the ceiling, where nothing is covered until the catastrophic limit stops your spending. Your real answer sits inside that band, and your plan brochure narrows it.
HSA pass-through dollars get the same treatment. The dataset records which plans are HSA eligible, and both high deductible plans here are, but it does not carry the contribution amount. So the comparison shows n/a for that line and subtracts nothing. Subtract your own pass-through from the HDHP column after you read the result.
Where the premiums come from
Every biweekly premium in the 10-plan set was copied cell for cell from OPM's published 2026 rate files, and the government and enrollee split is computed with OPM's own rule: the government pays the lesser of 75 percent of the total premium or the program-wide contribution cap for the tier. The figure the comparison uses is the enrollee share, which is what leaves your pay.
Regional HMOs are deliberately absent. OPM prices those per state or region, so representing one with a single nationwide number would be inaccurate on a money tool. For the single-plan view, including the monthly figures an annuitant sees, use the TRICARE vs FEHB comparison or the PSHB Part B calculator if you are postal.